El Comercio De La República - Europe's Economic Self-Sabotage

Lima -

Europe's Economic Self-Sabotage




Europe, once a beacon of economic prowess, is grappling with challenges that threaten its unique economic model. The European Union's economy, valued at approximately $20.29 trillion in nominal terms in 2025, stands as the second largest globally, yet it faces stagnation and competitive decline. Germany, France, and Italy, which collectively account for over half of the EU’s GDP, are pivotal to this narrative, but their struggles reverberate across the bloc.

The EU’s economic woes stem from a confluence of internal and external pressures. Germany, the bloc’s largest economy, contracted by 0.3% in the final quarter of 2023, hampered by high energy costs, a shortage of skilled labour, and chronic underinvestment in infrastructure. The automotive sector, a cornerstone of German industry, faces existential threats from Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers, who are flooding European markets with affordable alternatives. Central and Eastern Europe, heavily integrated into German supply chains, feel the ripple effects, with countries like Hungary and Slovakia at risk as demand falters.

Innovation, or the lack thereof, is a critical issue. The EU has failed to meet its target of spending 3% of GDP on research and development, languishing at around 2% for decades. This shortfall is stark when compared to the United States, where tech giants like Amazon and Alphabet dominate global innovation. Europe’s universities, with only one institution in the global top 30, struggle to drive cutting-edge research, and much of the bloc’s R&D funding is misallocated, particularly in Germany, where it is heavily skewed towards the automotive sector. This lack of diversification leaves Europe vulnerable in a rapidly evolving global economy.

Energy policy further complicates the picture. Despite a 26% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions per employed person over the past decade, 70% of the EU’s energy still comes from fossil fuels, and the bloc remains 63% dependent on imported fuel. The push for renewables, while commendable, is uneven—Sweden leads with nearly two-thirds of its energy from renewable sources, while countries like Ireland and Belgium lag behind. High energy prices, exacerbated by geopolitical tensions and the loss of Russian gas supplies, have strained energy-intensive industries, particularly in Germany.

Trade dynamics add another layer of complexity. The EU is the world’s largest exporter of manufactured goods and services, accounting for 14% of global trade. However, the spectre of tariffs, particularly from the United States, looms large. With over €500 billion in annual exports to the U.S., any imposition of tariffs could devastate European industries. The EU’s response—potential counter-tariffs or World Trade Organization complaints—may not suffice to protect its markets, especially as global supply chains face disruptions from conflicts and protectionist policies.

Internally, the EU’s single market, a cornerstone of its economic integration, is under strain. Calls for deeper integration, including a capital markets union and harmonised regulations, are met with resistance from member states guarding national interests. The EU’s budget, at €2 trillion for 2021–2027, is substantial but insufficient to address cross-border challenges like defence or green energy transitions. Moreover, the Council of Ministers’ veto system hampers swift decision-making, stalling progress on critical issues like a unified defence policy or fiscal coordination.

The EU’s social model, with 26.8% of GDP spent on welfare in 2023, is a point of pride but also a burden. High public debt in countries like Greece, Italy, and France, all exceeding 100% of GDP, limits fiscal flexibility. Austerity policies in the past have stifled growth, and the bloc’s projected population decline—to 420 million by 2100—raises concerns about sustaining this model amid an ageing workforce.

Geopolitical fragmentation exacerbates these challenges. The EU’s trade openness, with extra-EU trade exceeding 40% of GDP, makes it vulnerable to global disruptions. Initiatives like the Global Gateway aim to build resilient supply chains, but they compete with China’s Belt and Road and face internal coordination hurdles. Meanwhile, the euro, the world’s second most traded currency, is under scrutiny as global debt levels soar and the U.S. dollar’s dominance raises questions about financial stability.

Europe’s tourism sector, a bright spot, underscores its cultural and economic allure, accounting for 60% of global international visitors. Yet, even this strength is at risk from economic uncertainty and potential trade wars, which could deter visitors and disrupt the 1.1 billion annual tourism trips by EU residents.

The EU stands at a crossroads. Its unique blend of free-market principles and social welfare, coupled with an integrated single market, has long been a global model. However, without bold reforms—streamlining regulations, boosting innovation, diversifying energy sources, and deepening integration—the bloc risks undermining its economic vitality. The path forward demands urgency and unity, lest Europe’s economic legacy becomes a cautionary tale.



Featured


Stargate project, Trump and the AI war...

In a dramatic return to the global political stage, former President Donald J. Trump, as the current 47th President of the United States of America, has unveiled his latest initiative, the so-called ‘Stargate Project,’ in a bid to cement the United States’ dominance in artificial intelligence and outpace China’s meteoric rise in the field. The newly announced programme, cloaked in patriotic rhetoric and ambitious targets, is already stirring intense debate over the future of technological competition between the world’s two largest economies.According to preliminary statements from Trump’s team, the Stargate Project will consolidate the efforts of leading American tech conglomerates, defence contractors, and research universities under a centralised framework. The former president, who has long championed American exceptionalism, claims this approach will provide the United States with a decisive advantage, enabling rapid breakthroughs in cutting-edge AI applications ranging from military strategy to commercial innovation.“America must remain the global leader in technology—no ifs, no buts,” Trump declared at a recent press conference. “China has been trying to surpass us in AI, but with this new project, we will make sure the future remains ours.”Details regarding funding and governance remain scarce, but early indications suggest the initiative will rely heavily on public-private partnerships, tax incentives for research and development, and collaboration with high-profile venture capital firms. Skeptics, however, warn that the endeavour could fan the flames of an increasingly militarised AI race, raising ethical concerns about surveillance, automation of warfare, and data privacy. Critics also question whether the initiative can deliver on its lofty promises, especially in the face of existing economic and geopolitical pressures.Yet for its supporters, the Stargate Project serves as a rallying cry for renewed American leadership and an antidote to worries over China’s technological ascendancy. Proponents argue that accelerating AI research is paramount if the United States wishes to preserve not just military supremacy, but also the economic and cultural influence that has typified its global role for decades.Whether this bold project will succeed—or if it will devolve into a symbolic gesture—remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that the Stargate Project has already reignited debate about how best to safeguard America’s strategic future and maintain the balance of power in the fast-evolving arena of artificial intelligence.

Truth: The end of the ‘Roman Empire’

The fall of the Roman Empire in the fifth century AD has long captivated historians and the public alike. For centuries, scholars have debated the precise causes of the Empire’s decline, offering myriad explanations—ranging from political corruption and economic instability to moral degeneration and barbarian invasions. Yet despite the passage of time and the wealth of research available, there remains no single, universally accepted answer to the question: why did the Roman Empire truly collapse?A central factor often cited is political fragmentation. As the Empire grew too vast to govern effectively from one centre, Emperor Diocletian introduced the Tetrarchy—a system dividing the realm into eastern and western halves. While initially intended to provide administrative efficiency, this division ultimately paved the way for competing centres of power and weakened the unity that had long defined Roman rule. Frequent changes of leadership and civil wars further sapped the state’s coherence, undermining confidence in the imperial regime.Economics played an equally crucial role. Burdened by expensive military campaigns to protect ever-extending frontiers, the Empire resorted to debasing its currency, provoking rampant inflation and eroding public trust. The resulting fiscal strains fuelled social unrest, as high taxes weighed heavily upon small farmers and urban dwellers alike. Coupled with declining trade routes and resource depletion, these pressures contributed to a persistent sense of crisis.Compounding these challenges was the growing threat from beyond Rome’s borders. Germanic tribes such as the Visigoths, Vandals, and Ostrogoths gradually eroded the Western Empire’s defensive capabilities. While earlier Roman armies proved formidable, internal discord had dulled their edge, allowing external forces to breach once-impenetrable frontiers.Modern historians emphasise that the Empire did not fall solely because of barbarian invasions, moral decay, or fiscal collapse; instead, its downfall was the outcome of a confluence of factors, each interacting with the other. The story of Rome’s fall thus serves as a stark reminder that even the mightiest of civilisations can succumb to the inexorable weight of political, economic, and social upheaval.

Leo XIV and Trump: Allies?

Pope Leo XIV, born Robert Francis Prevost (69), has made history as the first American pope, a development that has drawn global attention, particularly from U.S. President Donald Trump (78). Trump, who has publicly expressed his excitement about having an American lead the Vatican, congratulated the new pope shortly after his election. In a statement, Trump declared, “It is such an honor to realize that he is the first American Pope. What excitement, and what a Great Honor for our Country. I look forward to meeting Pope Leo XIV. It will be a very meaningful moment!” This enthusiasm was mirrored by other American leaders, including former President Joe Biden and Vice President JD Vance, who also offered their congratulations. Yet, the relationship between Pope Leo XIV and Donald Trump is not as straightforward as it might appear. The pope has a history of voicing criticism toward Trump and his administration. In 2015, he shared an opinion piece that condemned Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric as problematic. More recently, he openly challenged Vice President JD Vance, asserting that Vance was “wrong” on certain issues. These statements hint at a divergence in views, particularly on topics like immigration and social justice, where the pope’s stance contrasts with policies championed by Trump. Despite these tensions, there remains room for cooperation. Both leaders have expressed interest in tackling global challenges, and Pope Leo XIV’s American roots could pave the way for improved dialogue between the Vatican and the U.S. government. Upon his election, the pope delivered a message of peace and justice from the Vatican balcony, a call that resonates amid ongoing international conflicts and humanitarian crises. Trump, meanwhile, has signaled a willingness to engage with the Vatican, potentially leveraging this unique connection. The dynamic between Pope Leo XIV and Donald Trump is layered and evolving. While their differences on key issues like immigration are evident, their shared goal of addressing global concerns could foster collaboration. As the first American pope, Leo XIV’s tenure will be closely observed, not only by the Catholic community but also by political figures like Trump, who may see this as an opportunity for a distinctive partnership. How this relationship unfolds will shape its influence on the Catholic Church and the broader world stage.