El Comercio De La República - Mexico defies Trump's demands

Mexico defies Trump's demands

Since Donald Trump took office as US president once again, relations between the US and Mexico have returned to the spotlight. Trade, migration and security are at the heart of bilateral discussions. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has positioned herself as a staunch opponent of Trump, responding to his demands and threats with diplomatic skill and national sovereignty.

A key point of contention is migration. Trump has announced plans to drastically reduce irregular immigration at the southern border of the United States and to rely on Mexico's support in doing so. He threatened to impose punitive tariffs if Mexico did not take sufficient action against the influx of migrants. Sheinbaum, however, has made it clear that Mexico will not compromise its sovereignty. She emphasised that the migration issue must be resolved through bilateral cooperation and respect for migrants' rights, rather than through unilateral measures. She also rejected Trump's proposal to send US troops to Mexico to combat drug trafficking. “Our sovereignty is not for sale,” she said in a public statement.

Mexico is also standing firm on trade. Trump has threatened to impose tariffs of up to 25 per cent on Mexican imports if the country does not change its policy on migration and drug trafficking. This threat is aimed in particular at the highly interconnected automotive sector, which is of great economic importance to both countries. Mexico is the United States' most important trading partner, and more than 75 percent of Mexican exports go to the United States. Nevertheless, Sheinbaum has emphasised that Mexico is not prepared to sacrifice its economic interests. Instead, she is focusing on negotiations and expanding economic relations in order to reduce dependence on the United States and open up new markets.

Another point of conflict is security policy. Trump has classified Mexican drug cartels as terrorist organisations and hinted that the US could intervene militarily if Mexico fails to bring the situation under control. Sheinbaum has firmly rejected these threats and pointed out that combating drug trafficking is a shared responsibility of both countries. She called on the US to stop the illegal trade in weapons across the border, which she said was fuelling violence in Mexico. ‘The solution does not lie in military intervention, but in controlling the border and reducing demand for drugs in the US,’ Sheinbaum said.

Despite the tensions, there are also areas where Mexico and the US are cooperating. For example, both countries have agreed to tighten controls on Mexico's southern border to stem the flow of migrants from Central America. Mexico is also seeking to use its role as a transit country for Chinese products to gain a strategic position in the trade war between the US and China. This could give Mexico additional room for negotiation.

Overall, it is clear that Mexico under Claudia Sheinbaum's leadership is pursuing a clear line towards the US. Instead of confrontation, she is focusing on diplomatic negotiations and strengthening national sovereignty. Whether this will be enough to curb Trump's demands remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that Mexico is not prepared to bow to the unilateral measures of the US and is instead pushing for a partnership-based solution to the challenges they face together.

Watch Live: Trump or Harris? America votes!

Georgia: Ruling party celebrates election victory

Asylum seekers: Return centres – a Solution?

Climate change: A farm in Rotterdam

EU: Overcoming barriers to equality

Germany and its outdated pension system

How important is sustainable development?

Berlin: EU-Summit of western Balkan heads of state

Putin's War Will Go Bankrupt if the Oil Prices Drop

Germany: The fight against economic migrants

Polish PM and the danger of asylum seekers

Ukraine: Recruiters searched Kyiv venues

Featured

Stargate project, Trump and the AI war...

In a dramatic return to the global political stage, former President Donald J. Trump, as the current 47th President of the United States of America, has unveiled his latest initiative, the so-called ‘Stargate Project,’ in a bid to cement the United States’ dominance in artificial intelligence and outpace China’s meteoric rise in the field. The newly announced programme, cloaked in patriotic rhetoric and ambitious targets, is already stirring intense debate over the future of technological competition between the world’s two largest economies.According to preliminary statements from Trump’s team, the Stargate Project will consolidate the efforts of leading American tech conglomerates, defence contractors, and research universities under a centralised framework. The former president, who has long championed American exceptionalism, claims this approach will provide the United States with a decisive advantage, enabling rapid breakthroughs in cutting-edge AI applications ranging from military strategy to commercial innovation.“America must remain the global leader in technology—no ifs, no buts,” Trump declared at a recent press conference. “China has been trying to surpass us in AI, but with this new project, we will make sure the future remains ours.”Details regarding funding and governance remain scarce, but early indications suggest the initiative will rely heavily on public-private partnerships, tax incentives for research and development, and collaboration with high-profile venture capital firms. Skeptics, however, warn that the endeavour could fan the flames of an increasingly militarised AI race, raising ethical concerns about surveillance, automation of warfare, and data privacy. Critics also question whether the initiative can deliver on its lofty promises, especially in the face of existing economic and geopolitical pressures.Yet for its supporters, the Stargate Project serves as a rallying cry for renewed American leadership and an antidote to worries over China’s technological ascendancy. Proponents argue that accelerating AI research is paramount if the United States wishes to preserve not just military supremacy, but also the economic and cultural influence that has typified its global role for decades.Whether this bold project will succeed—or if it will devolve into a symbolic gesture—remains to be seen. What is certain, however, is that the Stargate Project has already reignited debate about how best to safeguard America’s strategic future and maintain the balance of power in the fast-evolving arena of artificial intelligence.

Truth: The end of the ‘Roman Empire’

The fall of the Roman Empire in the fifth century AD has long captivated historians and the public alike. For centuries, scholars have debated the precise causes of the Empire’s decline, offering myriad explanations—ranging from political corruption and economic instability to moral degeneration and barbarian invasions. Yet despite the passage of time and the wealth of research available, there remains no single, universally accepted answer to the question: why did the Roman Empire truly collapse?A central factor often cited is political fragmentation. As the Empire grew too vast to govern effectively from one centre, Emperor Diocletian introduced the Tetrarchy—a system dividing the realm into eastern and western halves. While initially intended to provide administrative efficiency, this division ultimately paved the way for competing centres of power and weakened the unity that had long defined Roman rule. Frequent changes of leadership and civil wars further sapped the state’s coherence, undermining confidence in the imperial regime.Economics played an equally crucial role. Burdened by expensive military campaigns to protect ever-extending frontiers, the Empire resorted to debasing its currency, provoking rampant inflation and eroding public trust. The resulting fiscal strains fuelled social unrest, as high taxes weighed heavily upon small farmers and urban dwellers alike. Coupled with declining trade routes and resource depletion, these pressures contributed to a persistent sense of crisis.Compounding these challenges was the growing threat from beyond Rome’s borders. Germanic tribes such as the Visigoths, Vandals, and Ostrogoths gradually eroded the Western Empire’s defensive capabilities. While earlier Roman armies proved formidable, internal discord had dulled their edge, allowing external forces to breach once-impenetrable frontiers.Modern historians emphasise that the Empire did not fall solely because of barbarian invasions, moral decay, or fiscal collapse; instead, its downfall was the outcome of a confluence of factors, each interacting with the other. The story of Rome’s fall thus serves as a stark reminder that even the mightiest of civilisations can succumb to the inexorable weight of political, economic, and social upheaval.

Leo XIV and Trump: Allies?

Pope Leo XIV, born Robert Francis Prevost (69), has made history as the first American pope, a development that has drawn global attention, particularly from U.S. President Donald Trump (78). Trump, who has publicly expressed his excitement about having an American lead the Vatican, congratulated the new pope shortly after his election. In a statement, Trump declared, “It is such an honor to realize that he is the first American Pope. What excitement, and what a Great Honor for our Country. I look forward to meeting Pope Leo XIV. It will be a very meaningful moment!” This enthusiasm was mirrored by other American leaders, including former President Joe Biden and Vice President JD Vance, who also offered their congratulations. Yet, the relationship between Pope Leo XIV and Donald Trump is not as straightforward as it might appear. The pope has a history of voicing criticism toward Trump and his administration. In 2015, he shared an opinion piece that condemned Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric as problematic. More recently, he openly challenged Vice President JD Vance, asserting that Vance was “wrong” on certain issues. These statements hint at a divergence in views, particularly on topics like immigration and social justice, where the pope’s stance contrasts with policies championed by Trump. Despite these tensions, there remains room for cooperation. Both leaders have expressed interest in tackling global challenges, and Pope Leo XIV’s American roots could pave the way for improved dialogue between the Vatican and the U.S. government. Upon his election, the pope delivered a message of peace and justice from the Vatican balcony, a call that resonates amid ongoing international conflicts and humanitarian crises. Trump, meanwhile, has signaled a willingness to engage with the Vatican, potentially leveraging this unique connection. The dynamic between Pope Leo XIV and Donald Trump is layered and evolving. While their differences on key issues like immigration are evident, their shared goal of addressing global concerns could foster collaboration. As the first American pope, Leo XIV’s tenure will be closely observed, not only by the Catholic community but also by political figures like Trump, who may see this as an opportunity for a distinctive partnership. How this relationship unfolds will shape its influence on the Catholic Church and the broader world stage.